Treadway v. Semple
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Tenth Judicial District, Colusa County. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the Court below, and defendant appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
*655By the Court,
Sawyer, J.
This is an action brought under the provisions of section two hundred fifty-four of the Practice Act by the party in possession of Lot No. 1, in Block 32, in the Town of Colusa, for the purpose of determining a claim of title adverse to him, made by the defendant. The complaint—which is verified— sets out with great particularity a deraignment of the respective titles under which both of the parties claim. None of the material allegations of the complaint are denied, and they are, therefore, for the purposes of the action to be taken as true. Both claim under grants…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Waterman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Thornton v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by8 opinions
- Semple v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- De Bernal v. LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Yates v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Bissell v. HenshawU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1871
- Boyle v. HindsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.