Legal Opinion

Daniel & Daniel, Inc. v. Cosmopolitan Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 9, 1976No. 51437, 51438PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, Judge.

Can the lack of venue as against an original defendant be cured by the joinder of a new party defendant? That is the principal question presented in this appeal from the grant of motions to dismiss for lack of venue.

Daniel & Daniel, Inc. filed a lien foreclosure action against the Cosmopolitan Company (Cosmopolitan) in DeKalb County, the complaint reciting defendant to have its principal place of business in that county. Cosmopolitan answered pleading inter alia, a want of venue defense. Subsequently plaintiff moved to add Utica Mutual Insurance Company (Utica), a foreign…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. Approved Bancredit Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. FulcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. HD Supply, Inc. v. GargerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Leniston v. BonfiglioCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Logan Paving Co. v. Liles Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Slater v. Brigadier Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Foster v. Wilmington Plantation Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API