Daniel & Daniel, Inc. v. Cosmopolitan Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, Judge.
Can the lack of venue as against an original defendant be cured by the joinder of a new party defendant? That is the principal question presented in this appeal from the grant of motions to dismiss for lack of venue.
Daniel & Daniel, Inc. filed a lien foreclosure action against the Cosmopolitan Company (Cosmopolitan) in DeKalb County, the complaint reciting defendant to have its principal place of business in that county. Cosmopolitan answered pleading inter alia, a want of venue defense. Subsequently plaintiff moved to add Utica Mutual Insurance Company (Utica), a foreign…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Martin v. Approved Bancredit Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. FulcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
3Cited by8 opinions
- HD Supply, Inc. v. GargerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Leniston v. BonfiglioCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Logan Paving Co. v. Liles Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Slater v. Brigadier Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Foster v. Wilmington Plantation Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.