Michael R. Jent v. State of Indiana

Pyle, Judge.

Statement of the Case

[1] Michael Jent ("Jent"), pro se, appeals the post-conviction court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. Concluding that Jent has failed to show that the post-conviction court erred by denying his petition for post-conviction relief, we affirm the post-conviction court's judgment.

[2] We affirm.

Issue

Whether the post-conviction court erred by summarily denying Jent's petition for post-conviction relief.

Facts

[3] In November of 2002, the State charged Jent with Class A misdemeanor invasion of privacy, Class A misdemeanor interfering with the…