Legal Opinion

Murphey v. Weil

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEALS from the Superior Court of Milwaukee County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The action was tried by a jury, who returned a special verdict. There are two appeals. Plaintiff *644appealed from an order setting aside the special verdict and granting a new trial on the ground that the findings of the special verdict are inconsistent. Defendant appealed from an order denying his motion for judgment upon the minutes of the court and the special verdict.

The plaintiff moves to dismiss the defendant’s appeal on the ground that the order is not appealable. We think it is appealable. It was not followed by judgment for the opposite party, from which an appeal could be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. Town of WashburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wolfgram v. Town of SchoepkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Mills v. ConleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Rottsoll v. Two Rivers Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API