Legal Opinion

Poppe v. Ruocco

New York City Family Court

Decided December 12, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Catherine DiDomenico, J.

*943By petitions dated March 14, 2006, June 13, 2006, July 24, 2006, and November 13, 2006 petitioners, John and Mary Rose Poppe, seek an order finding respondent, Laura Ruocco in wilful violation of an order dated December 1, 2005 (Porzio, J.) (the visitation order) that granted the Poppes visitation rights with their grandchildren, N.R. (12) and D.R. (11). (Matter of Poppe v Ruocco, 37 AD3d 608 [2d Dept 2007].) Respondent is the adoptive mother of these children. By cross petition dated May 30, 2007, respondent mother moves to vacate the visitation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Friederwitzer v. FriederwitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Emanuel S. v. Joseph E.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Wilson v. McGlincheyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Lo Presti v. Lo PrestiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API