Kastner v. Kastner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Julius Kastner and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term-arid entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 23d day of May, 1900, denying the defendants’ motion to vacate an order for the examination of the defendants in order to enable the plaintiff to frame her complaint in an action to compel an accounting as to partnership assets.
1Opinion of the Court
Hatch, J. :
The plaintiff is the administratrix of Arthur J. Kastner, deceased. In the papers which furnished the basis for granting the motion, it appeared that the plaintiff’s intestate, prior to his death, was a member of the firm of Julius Kastner & Sons; that plaintiff is not informed concerning the terms of the copartnership which existed between the parties, or with any knowledge in connection therewith *294except the fact that the copartnership existed; that defendants, the surviving partners of said firm, refuse her any information as to the terms and conditions of the articles of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Russell v. . McCallNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Hooley v. GieveNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1879
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rosenbaum v. RiceNew York Supreme Court · 1901
- In re the Estate of BlankNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- Oppenheim v. AbbottNew York Supreme Court · 1916