In Re Harris

It is undisputed that the trial court failed to address Harris personally and to determine that (1) Harris was making his admission of delinquency voluntarily with understanding of the nature of the allegations and the consequences of the admission, and that (2) Harris understood that by entering his admission he was waiving the right to challenge the witnesses and evidence against him, to remain silent, and to introduce evidence at the adjudicatory hearing, as required by Juv.R. 29(D).

In a ternunation-of-parental-rights case, we held that the failure to comply with the requirements of Juv.R.…