State v. Cunningham
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Oxner, Justice.
Appellant was tried on an indictment charging him (1) with manufacturing alcoholic liquors, and (2) with unlawfully having “in his possession one case of fruit jars, being apparatus, appliances, or devices to be used for the purpose of manufacturing alcoholic liquors.” At the conclusion of the evidence he made a motion for a directed verdict as to both counts, which was refused and the case submitted to the jury. He was acquitted by the jury on the first charge mentioned and found guilty on the second. A motion to set aside the verdict was refused. From the sentence and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hawkins v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
- Perkins v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1926