Lawrence v. Doolan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in the opinion of Mr. Justice Myrick in Department Two.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
— In the petition for rehearing, the opinion of Department Two, heretofore delivered, is not controverted, in so far as it determines that there was no misjoinder of parties defendant, and that two causes of action were not improperly joined. But it is claimed that the conclusion there arrived at was not sound, in that it declared the sureties of Austin, the tax collector, were responsible for the money received by him, in his official capacity, from Mrs. Lawrence, the plaintiff, and that the statute of limitations did not bar her right of action against them.
In reference to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Randall v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by6 opinions
- Briggs v. BreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- City of Spokane v. CostelloWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Braithwaite v. AikinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Pruett v. CaddiganNevada Supreme Court · 1918
- Wilson v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.