Legal Opinion

Thomason v. Mullinax

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 7, 1981No. 79-171PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a decree quieting in the heirs of Sam Mullinax title to all the minerals underlying certain land located in Fayette County, Alabama. We reverse.

In 1934, Sam Mullinax purchased from M.B. Earnest land located in Fayette County. The deed from Earnest to Mullinax contained a reservation excepting the minerals and mining rights. Even though he only owned the surface, Mullinax assessed the entire property until 19571 when he conveyed the property to a third party, reserving the minerals and mining rights to himself. During the period between 1934 and 1957, Mullinax conducted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hooper v. Bankhead & BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Piney Oil & Gas Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Sanford v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Gertz v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Smith v. McNaughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shelton v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Downey v. North Alabama Mineral Development Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Ex Parte Siemag, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  5. In Re Estates of AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API