Schmaltz v. Mead
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Actions by William Schmaltz, Andrew Schmaltz, and Gilbert Wood against Sarah F. Mead, George W. Mead, and others. From the judgment given Sarah F. Mead appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Larremore, O. J.
These actions were consolidated by order of the court, and have been tried together. The plaintiffs and the defendants Witt and Abbott are mechanics and material-men, who have performed labor and furnished materials upon, and which were used in the erection of, certain buildings upon land in Madison avenue, in the city of New York, owned by the defendant Sarah F. Mead. In this action it is sought to foreclose mechanics’ lien filed by them respectively. The labor and materials were performed *615and furnished under employment and purchase by one George ICuhn, since deceased. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Otis v. . DoddNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Husted v. . MathesNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Quincey v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Hammond v. ShepardNew York Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller v. . MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Mosher v. LewisNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894