Rhodes v. State

1. There is nothing that requires the grant of a new trial in the ground of the motion for a new trial which alleges that the court erred in the charge on confessions.

2. Under the ruling in Lee v. State, 35 Ga. App. 235 (133 S. E. 281), there is no merit in any of the other special grounds of the motion. See also Walker v. Dorminey, 150 Ga. 635 (104 S. E. 447).

3. There is ample evidence to sustain the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.