Legal Opinion

Baber v. Rickart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1876PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

The appellees sued the appellant upon two promissory notes. The appellant answered that the notes were given for and in consideration of the right to make, use and vend a certain patented ditching machine, within certain prescribed limits; that the appellees warranted that said machine would do certain work; that upon a proper test the said machine had utterly failed to perform as warranted ; and that such machine was utterly worthless. Eeply in denial, trial, verdict and judgment for plaintiffs.

A new trial was asked, upon the grounds that the court had erred in overruling a motion to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Caffrey v. DudgeonIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Hawkins v. State ex rel. ReadIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Denman v. McMahinIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Madison, Indianapolis, & Peru Railroad v. WhiteselIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Boggs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. OtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Lever Bros. Co. v. Atlas Assur. Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  3. Enos Coal Mining Co. v. SCHUCHARTIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Gillam v. J. C. Penney Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  5. McRorie v. . MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API