Frontline Technologies, Inc. v. CRS, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Frontline Technologies, Inc. (“Plaintiff’) filed this patent infringement and breach of contract action against Defendant CRS, Inc. (“Defendant”) over a technology that facilitates replacement of absent workers with substitute workers. Plaintiff avers that Defendant’s SubFinder *603products infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,675,-151 (“the '151 patent”) for substitute worker technology. Second Am. Compl. ¶ 14, ECF No. 96. In its Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff pleads two counts: (1) infringement of the '151 patent and (2) breach of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- FORRESTER v. SOLEBURY TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- REECON NORTH AMERICA, LLC v. ENERCO GROUP, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023