Legal Opinion

Frontline Technologies, Inc. v. CRS, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 26, 2012No. Civil Action No. 07-2457PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Frontline Technologies, Inc. (“Plaintiff’) filed this patent infringement and breach of contract action against Defendant CRS, Inc. (“Defendant”) over a technology that facilitates replacement of absent workers with substitute workers. Plaintiff avers that Defendant’s SubFinder *603products infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,675,-151 (“the '151 patent”) for substitute worker technology. Second Am. Compl. ¶ 14, ECF No. 96. In its Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff pleads two counts: (1) infringement of the '151 patent and (2) breach of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  5. 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. FORRESTER v. SOLEBURY TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. REECON NORTH AMERICA, LLC v. ENERCO GROUP, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API