Legal Opinion

Nordin v. May

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 20, 1953No. 14836PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

COLLET, Circuit Judge.

In this action the plaintiff, Andrew Nordin, seeks to recover damages from the defendant, W. D. May, for loss occasioned Nordin from May’s refusal to furnish Nordin with steam to operate Nor din’s dry kilns. Nordin was also operating an oak flooring plant. The dry kilns were used in the operation of the oak flooring plant. May was operating a sawmill and steam generating plant under a lease on property adjacent to Nordin’s plant. Nordin claims that because of a covenant in a mortgage made by the former owner of the oak flooring plant and dry kilns to Nordin, under the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nordin v. MayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  2. United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API