Legal Opinion
Sotack v. Pennsylvania Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 28, 2000No. CIV. A. 99-CV-4709PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Before me is defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the basis that defendants are not state actors.1 For the *473following reasons, I conclude that defendant Pennsylvania Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association (“PPCI-GA”) is a government entity and its operatives are state actors, and therefore, I will deny defendants’ motion.
1. FACTS
In 1993, Jess Sotack was severely injured in an automobile accident. After the accident, Sotack was treated for his injuries at Gnaden Huetten Memorial Hospital (the “Hospital”) by Doctors Peter Tey…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alabama v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sotack v. PENNSYLVANIA PROPERTY & CAS. INS. GUAR. ASS'N.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000