Legal Opinion

E. L. Rice & Co. v. Pike

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1927No. 20425PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The plaintiff in error claims that the Court of Appeals erred in dismissing the petition in error in that court, upon the grounds: (1) That the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the petition in error was not signed or verified by the defendant in error or his attorney; (2) that the motion did not raise the question of the sufficiency of the waiver of the summons in error; and (3) that the judgment was contrary to law.

The record does show that the motion of the defendant in error was not signed or verified by the defendant in error or his attorney. However, the record fails to show…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fulton v. RamseyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. White v. WhiteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Honeycutt v. NyquistWyoming Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pilgrim Distributing Corp. v. Galsworthy, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Robinson v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Cox v. Pabst Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Thornhill v. HustonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1951
  5. Weier v. ThorneOhio Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API