Perez v. Townsend Engineering Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
THOMAS M. BLEWITT, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Background.
On May 28, 2008, Defendant filed a Motion in Limine raising five issues, Issues A-E. (Doc. 54). The remaining issues in the Defendant’s motion are as follows: 1
A) That the Plaintiffs should be precluded from stating that the patent for the Townsend 7600 Skinning Machine says that the machine “is dangerous”;
B) That the Plaintiffs should be precluded from stating that the British HSE recommends the Grasselli CLO machine with the “touch stop” system;
C) That the testimony of the Plaintiffs’ expert witness, Ralph…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stecyk v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Lewis v. Coffing Hoist Div., Duff-NortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- United States v. LeoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States of America Government of the Virgin Islands v. Edwin VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Paul R. Forrest v. Beloit Corporation Harnischfeger Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Armstrong v. Boston Scientific CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2018
- Caldera v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- Caldera v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- Caldera v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- Caldera v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.