Legal Opinion

Perez v. Townsend Engineering Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 2008No. Civil Action 4:CV-05-2337PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

THOMAS M. BLEWITT, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Background.

On May 28, 2008, Defendant filed a Motion in Limine raising five issues, Issues A-E. (Doc. 54). The remaining issues in the Defendant’s motion are as follows: 1

A) That the Plaintiffs should be precluded from stating that the patent for the Townsend 7600 Skinning Machine says that the machine “is dangerous”;

B) That the Plaintiffs should be precluded from stating that the British HSE recommends the Grasselli CLO machine with the “touch stop” system;

C) That the testimony of the Plaintiffs’ expert witness, Ralph…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stecyk v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Lewis v. Coffing Hoist Div., Duff-NortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. United States v. LeoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. United States of America Government of the Virgin Islands v. Edwin VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. Paul R. Forrest v. Beloit Corporation Harnischfeger Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Boston Scientific CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2018
  2. Caldera v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020
  3. Caldera v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020
  4. Caldera v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020
  5. Caldera v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API