Underwood v. Brower
New York Supreme Court
An inquisition was taken in this cause upon a writ of inquiry for the assessment of damages. The defendant asked to be let in to defend, which was granted upon the terms that the judgment which had been entered on the inquisition should stand1 as security for such sum as the plaintiff might eventually recover, and on payment of costs. The question was, what costs should be paid by the defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
*268 By the Court,
Nelson,. J.
The defendant must pay the costs of the inquest and of the subsequent proceedings had in the suit, including the costs of opposing this motion. Should the defendant succeed in the suit, the costs now accrued might be set off against those to which he would in that case be entitled ; but if the plaintiff should succeed, unless the costs now .accrued through the default of the defendant are paid, the plaintiff may be subjected to the whole expense of an issue and trial, and the defendant not be able to remunerate him. All the costs therefore which have accrued from the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Fitch v. DevlinNew York Supreme Court · 1853
- Casey v. MarchTexas Supreme Court · 1867
- Crofut v. BrandtNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1874
- Matthews v. American Central InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896