Legal Opinion
Brown v. City of Oneonta
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided February 20, 1996No. 3:93-cv-00349PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER
McAVOY, Chief Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts of this case are well-known to the court and the parties. Accordingly, the court will not recite them herein.
II. DISCUSSION
A. Standard For Reconsideration
“A court is justified in reconsidering its previous ruling if: (1) there is an intervening change in the controlling law; (2) new evidence not previously available comes to light; or (3) it becomes necessary to remedy a clear error of law or to prevent obvious injustice.” Hester Industries, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 160 F.R.D. 15, 16 (N.D.N.Y.1995) (citing, Larsen v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sheldon Barr v. Robert Abrams, Orestes J. Mihaly, Mark A. Tepper, Rebecca Mullane, William Bottiglieri, and Janey Renee O'COnnOrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc. v. ReganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Ferraro v. Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Larsen v. OrtegaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marriott v. County of MontgomeryDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2006
- Sigma Financial Corp. v. American International Specialty Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Latouche v. North Country Union High School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2001
- Loritz v. CMT BLUESDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2003
- Brown v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.