Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. City of Kansas City

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1989No. WD 41652PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAITAN, Presiding Judge.

Appellant, Carl Hewitt, was found guilty in a jury-waived trial de novo of intentionally inflicting bodily harm, and hindering and interfering with a police officer in the dis*126charge of his duty, §§ 26.13.2 and 26.35 Revised Ordinances of the City of Kansas City, Missouri (1967). The appellant appeals his convictions, contending that the trial court erred in: (1) finding sufficient evidence to support the convictions; (2) allegedly restricting cross-examination of the City’s witness, Clinton John Hewitt; and (3) in sentencing appellant to a term of imprisonment and fine…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. BolderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. State v. BiddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. State v. LeisureSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. State v. LytleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. State v. BarnesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API