Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Moss

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1975No. 36432Published

1DissentSimeone, Judge

I must respectfully dissent. I believe that our preliminary writ of prohibition should be made absolute.

Relator seeks to prohibit the respondent from further enforcement of a part of a judgment of the trial court rendered on March 27, 1972, awarding prejudgment interest in an inverse condemnation case from the date of “taking,” December 1, 1966.1

*87For a clear picture of my reasons, I reiterate some of the essential facts. In April, 1968, plaintiff, Reorganized School District No. 2, filed an inverse condemnation action against relator-defendant, Missouri Pacific Railroad, for the taking of a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. VasquezSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  2. St. Louis, Kennett & Southern Railroad v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. State Ex Rel. Sisters of St. Mary v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. State Ex Rel. Berbiglia, Inc. v. RandallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. State ex rel. St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railway Co. v. WithrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API