Legal Opinion

Kay Gee Produce Co. v. Salem

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1997No. Nos. 71326 and 70277Published

1Opinion of the Court

Patricia Ann Blackmon, Presiding Judge.

Kay Gee Produce Company (“Kay Gee”), plaintiff-appellant, appeals a trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Sam Salem, a.k.a. Seleem Salem (“Seleem Salem”), Enam Salem, Mary Dynes, Charles Bueter, and Francis Gaul, defendants-appellees. Kay Gee filed a foreclosure action on property of Salem, which property had been sold to Dynes and Bueter. Kay Gee claimed to have a valid judgment lien against the property and the judgment was not satisfied at the time of sale. In their summary judgment motion, the defendants-appellees argued that the judgment lien…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Wiley v. National Garages, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Holden v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Hafeez v. Farra (In re Hafeez)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API