Legal Opinion
The Betsy Ross
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1944No. 10705PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, Peter Cekalovich, Dominic Mratinich and Frank Muljat, co-owners and claimants of the diesel screw fishing boat, Betsy Ross, appeal personally and as such claimants from a decree in admiralty holding the appellants and the Betsy Ross liable for the wages, maintenance and cure of appellee Ruljanovich, a seaman on the Betsy Ross and in the employ of her owners, because of injuries received in the course of that employment. Ruljanovich cross-appeals from the decree’s denial of his recovery for personal injuries under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688.
*689The amended…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- O'Donnell v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Occidental Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Mason v. EvanisevichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vitco v. JoncichDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Gebhard v. S.S. Hawaiian LegislatorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Virginia J. King, as Administratrix of the Estate of John Elvins King v. Pan American World Airways, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Fish v. Richfield Oil CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.