Legal Opinion
BAEZA-GALINDO
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided January 31, 2025No. ID 4085PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
29 I&N Dec. 1
(BIA 2025) Interim Decision #4085 Matter of Carlos Manuel BAEZA-GALINDO, Respondent Decided January 31, 2025 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Proximity in time is necessary but not sufficient to conclude that two crimes arise from a single scheme of criminal misconduct under section 237(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(ii) (2018). Matter of Adetiba,
20 I&N Dec. 506, 509
(BIA 1992), clarified. (2) Two crimes involving moral turpitude, premised on separate…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fong Haw Tan v. PhelanSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Benjamine Maduka Okoro v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Mlaith Abdelqadar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Thanh Huu Nguyen v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- BAEZA-GALINDOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025