Legal Opinion

United States v. Stange

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 26, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LUSE, District Judge.

The cause was submitted on an agreed statement of facts and a jury waived. The facts stated in the stipulation are adopted as the court’s findings of fact. The controversy arises over dividends declared and paid to the defendant by the A. H. Stange Company pursuant to a resolution of the directors as follows:

“Whereas, * * * prior to the enactment of the Federal Income Tax Laws our mill and factory plant account which for a number of years had been carried at the nominal sum of $25,000 * * * and
“Whereas, in order to establish a proper basis of accounting due to said loss,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Mason v. RoutzahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Gulf Refining Co. of La. v. NorvellSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Rio Grande Western Railway Co. v. StringhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoblitzelle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API