Legal Opinion

Highlander v. Fluke

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1818PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the court of the third district.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The plaintiff states, that the defendant, Vernon, sheriff of his parish, has illegally taken three of his slaves, on an execution issued in a cause, in which the defendant Fluke waS plaintiff, and one Howard, defendant. The answer, after a general denial, avers that the slaves property siezed as the property of Howard. *443There was a verdict and judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff appealed.

East'n District. March, 1818.

The record is accompanied by a statement of facts, and the plaintiff and appellant has filed an assignment of errors.

The statement of facts apprises us, that at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayor v. BaileySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1818

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lyons v. American Cigar Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  2. Heirs of McVoy v. HallettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  3. Morgan v. M'GowanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1816
  4. Tucker v. BenedictSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API