Legal Opinion

Swing v. Swing

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The action in the court of common pleas was for partition. All necessary parties were brought in by the attorneys for the plaintiff.

The Miami Savings & Loan Company, a corporation, filed an answer and cross-petition, praying for judgment, and joining in the prayer of the petition.

On December 1, 1924, the court of common pleas rendered a decree foreclosing the equity of redemption in the mortgage against Frederick C. Swing and Nellie 0. Swing, and directing that:

“They shall within 5 days from the entering of this decree, pay or cause to be paid to the clerk of this court costs, *…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re SchwartzDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
  2. Matter of SchwartzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
  3. Longwell v. Banco Mortgage Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
  4. In Re BertschUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1982
  5. In Re BristolUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API