Tigue v. Annowski
Superior Court of Buffalo
On motion for a new trial. Assumpsit by Thomas Tigue against Caroline Annowski to recover $200 loaned to her through her son, John R. Annowski, as her agent. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant moves for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtTitus, J.
This action was brought to recover $200 claimed to have been loaned to the defendant by the plaintiff in 1882. The answer is a general denial. On the trial the plaintiff gave evidence to establish his cause of action, and the defendant’s proof tended to disprove the plaintiff’s claim. The theory of the plaintiff’s case is that the plaintiff loaned the money to the defendant at the request of John R. Annowski, a son of the defendant, as her •agent. While the defendant admits that she received the money from her son, it was not as a loan from the plaintiff or anybody else, but a Christmas…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shumway v. FowlerNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Sargent v.New York Supreme Court · 1825
- Messenger v. Fourth National BankNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1875
- Carpenter v. CoeNew York Supreme Court · 1873
- Peck v. HilerNew York Supreme Court · 1860
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.