Legal Opinion

Nicolson v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 29, 1943No. Nos. 8098, 8099Published

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

This is an ejectment suit. The original plaintiff, appellant Nicolson, sued as successor of the Trustees of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company, to whom the land in suit was conveyed in 1839. The defendants and their predecessors had occupied, improved, and paid taxes on the land for many years before suit, and claimed title by adverse possession. The District Court dismissed Nicolson’s complaint. It afterwards granted a “new trial” so as to permit the United States, which claimed title through the Canal Company, to intervene as plaintiff. The United States filed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boston & Albany Railroad v. ReardonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Freid v. McGrathCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. United States v. Big Horn Land & Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  4. Bond v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  5. MacKall v. Chesapeake and Ohio Canal CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API