Legal Opinion
Amoco Production Co. v. Carruth
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided July 6, 1987No. 86 CA 0717PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHORTESS, Judge.
This appeal stems from a concursus proceeding provoked by Amoco Production Corporation. As part of that action, J. Burton LeBlanc (LeBlanc) sought cancellation of a mineral sublease. In a lengthy judgment involving many parties, most not involved in this appeal, the trial court declared that the mineral sublease executed by LeBlanc as sublessor and Exxon Corporation (Exxon) as sublessee remained in full force and effect. LeBlanc has perfected this appeal.
On January 31,1979, LeBlanc and Exxon executed the sublease covering several parcels of land, including the 14 acres in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rebstock v. Birthright Oil & Gas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Broadhead v. Pan American Petroleum CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Woods v. RatliffLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Talley v. LawhonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Southwest Gas Producing Co. v. Creslenn Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- B.A. Kelly Land Co., L.L.C. v. Questar Exploration & Production Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Frankel v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Amoco Production Co. v. CarruthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988