Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Tabone

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 7, 2009No. SC 18119Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

SCHALLER, J.,

with whom VERTEFEUILLE, J., joins, concurring in part and dissenting in part. This case presents the question of what steps our law permits a court to take in an effort to reconcile criminal statutes that are in conflict to the extent that the statutory scheme is rendered unworkable. General Statutes § 1-2z*4431 authorizes the judiciary to determine the meaning of a statute or of a statutory scheme in a manner that does not yield “unworkable” results. If, however, after resort to traditional methods of statutory construction, two criminal statutes cannot be reconciled, that is, the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. TateoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API