Legal Opinion

State v. Glover

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 10, 2014No. 110350PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bruns, P.J.:

Nelson Glover appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to withdraw his plea. Glover contends that his counsel coerced him into pleading guilty. As a result, he contends that he did not voluntarily and knowingly enter a guilty plea. A review of the record reveals that Glover’s decision was not a product of coercion. Instead, we find that Glover made a tactical decision based on the advice of competent legal counsel after exten sive plea negotiations. Moreover, we reject Glover’s argument that he should be able to withdraw his plea simply because he changed his mind.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. State v. EdgarSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. AguilarSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. Gillett v. Unified School District No. 276Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. Fischer v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. State v. OronaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
  3. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API