Legal Opinion

Haldane v. Bogy

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 1962No. Civ. 26076PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

This is an appeal purportedly taken from a judgment of dismissal entered in favor of respondent following the failure of appellant to amend his complaint within the time allowed after respondent’s general and special demurrers had been sustained. The record before us does not indicate that any formal judgment was in fact entered, but does contain a duly entered minute order granting respondent’s motion to dismiss the action. We shall therefore treat the appeal as having been taken from this order. (Herrscher v. Herrscher, 41 Cal.2d 300, 303-304 [259 P.2d 901]; Jeffers v. Screen Extras Guild,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stowe v. Fritzie Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Herrscher v. HerrscherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Jeffers v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Rudley v. TobiasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hilltop Properties, Inc. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Rosefield v. RosefieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. People v. CavannaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Haldane v. BogyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API