Legal Opinion

Bair v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided December 7, 1993No. 92-1477PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

By a single-judge order dated September 10, 1993, the Court denied appellant’s motion to supplement the record on appeal. By a single-judge order dated September 21,1993, the Court denied appellant’s motion to remove Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, as a party to this appeal. On October 18, 1993, the Court denied appellant’s motions for reconsideration as to each order.

*69On October 28, 1993, appellant filed a motion for review by a panel or by the Court en banc, pursuant to Rule 35 of this Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure or, in the alternative, for extraordinary relief…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Bethea v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  3. Kushindana v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  4. Hayes v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Snyder v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
  2. Morris v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API