Lippman v. Hunt

Plaintiff attempted to purchase some lands in Oakland county under an agreement, the terms of which were indefinite and incomplete. We held in Lippman v. Featherston, 247 Mich. 153, that the minds of the parties had never fully met, and the agreement was void. Prior to the litigation, while negotiations were still pending to settle the differences arising out of the incomplete agreement, plaintiff, through his agent and office associate Yer Wiebe, sent for defendants Bostwick and Teets, who were partly instrumental in securing the purchase of the property for plaintiff. Defendant Hunt was…