Legal Opinion

United States v. Port of Portland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 4, 1924No. 4233PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). We must overrule appellee’s contention that jurisdiction is lacking in admiralty in personam against the port of Portland, upon the doctrine of governmental immunity for municipal acts done in furtherance of govemmentally directed duties. Under the rule of Workman v. New York, 179 U. S. 552, 21 Sup. Ct. 212, 45 L. Ed. 314, followed by this court in The Thielbek, 241 Fed. 209, 154 C. C. A. 571, a municipal corporation, being suable for the negligence of its employes and the faults of its ships, is subject to the process of a court of admiralty,, and, if an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Workman v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. The John G. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Sturgis v. BoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  4. The" Civilta" and The" Restless"Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. The Clarence L. BlakesleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frame v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  2. Sorensen v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  3. Marquette Transportation Company Gulf-Inland, LLC v. Navigation Maritime BulgareaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API