Woods v. Adams
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and other papers along with the attached Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Final Report and Recommendation. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court concurs with and adopts the conclusions of the Magistrate…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. HollinquestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Lopez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Guam · 2025