Legal Opinion

People v. Haney

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1989No. C004215PublishedCited by 6 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

In this case involving a plea bargain, the prosecution promised not to charge defendant with enhancements based on his service of prior prison terms. In the published portion of this opinion we hold that the plea bargain did not contain an implied condition precluding the trial court from using defendant’s prior prison terms as an aggravating factor to impose the upper term of imprisonment in state prison.

Defendant pled guilty before a magistrate to one count of voluntary manslaughter and one count of robbery for crimes committed on or about September 1, 1987. (Pen. Code, §§…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SheltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. Gary B.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. SnowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. People v. SheltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. McClellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API