Blythe v. James Lock & Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtStevenson, J.
The instant appeal stems from the trial court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs products liability suit for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e). The plaintiff argued that the approximate 13-month period of record inactivity was due to his search for a no longer manufactured and hard-to-find polo helmet which was to be used in destructive testing by his expert. The trial judge agreed that the reason for the record inactivity was legitimate, but found that since plaintiff could not demonstrate that he had contact with the opposing party during the period of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Norflor Const. Corp. v. City of GainesvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Togo's Eatery of Florida, Inc. v. FrohlichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Edgecumbe v. American General Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Barton-Malow Co. v. Gorman Co. of Ocala, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Modellista De Europa v. REDPATH INVESTMENTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Havens v. ChamblissDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005