Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided July 15, 1975Published

1Opinion of the Court

QUESTION: May a municipality require, pursuant to s. 468.106(6), F.S., an occupational license from a person who does not maintain a permanent business location or branch office within such municipality, notwithstanding s. 205.042, F.S.?

SUMMARY: A municipality may not require, pursuant to s. 468.106(6), F.S., an occupational license from a person who does not maintain a permanent business location or branch office within such municipality in view of the provisions of s. 205.042, F.S. Your question is answered in the negative for the reasons set forth hereinafter. Although not expressly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duffin v. TuckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Isern v. City of West MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. Berry v. City of Dania, Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Broward County1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API