Robert Rowland Hargraves, Jr. v. Leslie S. Bowden, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
A motion to dismiss was filed because appellant failed (1) to file bond on appeal, (2) to file specifications of error, and (3) to designate the points upon which he would rely. The Court indicated the motion would be granted at the hearing on October 14, 1954, but at the insistence of appellant granted him time to file additional authorities, which he did and also rushed into the Clerk’s office with a bond, which was filed.
It is true the matter lies in discretion. United States v. Gallagher, 9 Cir., 151 F.2d 556. The attorneys should make an attempt to conform to the rules and not try to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Coursey v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Markham v. KallimanisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
3Cited by6 opinions
- Molton G. Smith v. Walter T. Stone, Chief Division of Adult Paroles of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Edward A. Jensen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- MacNeil Bros. Company v. State Realty Company of Boston, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- MacNeil Bros. Company v. Felix ForteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
- Evert L. Hagan and W. Graham v. Joseph C. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.