Legal Opinion

Allen v. Florence & Cripple Creek Railway Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1900No. 1834Published

Error to the District Court of El Paso County.

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

By this action, plaintiff sought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received and suffered by him through the negligence of the defendant railroad company. At the conclusion of the evidence offered on behalf of plaintiff, the court, on motion, granted a nonsuit, and to this plaintiff assigns error. The motion for nonsuit was based and sustained solely upon the ground of plaintiff’s contributory negligence. This court is, therefore, relieved from the consideration of the facts and much of the argument of counsel which bear upon the question of defendant’s negligence.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Lord v. Pueblo Smelting & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  4. Moffatt v. TenneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  5. Hanley v. California Bridge & Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API