Legal Opinion

Wydler v. Cristenfeld

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1974PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division is affirmed.

Appellant’s attack on the infirmities of the action taken by the Democratic Policy Committee pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 137 of the Election Law, is unavailing (cf. Matter of Nirenberg v. Vogt, 27 N Y 2d 770). That provision has as its purpose the regulation of the affairs of a political party and is intended to have as its beneficiaries, only members of that political party or one who asserts that he was entitled to the authorization thereunder. It is of no interest to others that formalities have not been followed, so long…

2Cited by37 opinions

  1. Stempel v. Albany County Board of ElectionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Stempel v. Albany County Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Martin v. TutunjianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Rose v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Liepshutz v. PalmateerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API