Legal Opinion

Del Valle v. Hyland

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Jose A. Del Valle against Josiah A. Hyland and Jose F. Navarro to set aside the transfer of certain life insurance policies. From a judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

1Per curiam

This action is brought by a judgment creditor of the defendant Navarro to set aside the transfer made to the defendant Hyland of five life insurance policies upon the life of the defendant Navarro for $10,000 each, on the ground that the same was made to hinder, delay, and defraud creditors of Navarro. The first trial of this action resulted in a judgment dismissing the complaint upon the plaintiff’s case, which judgment, upon appeal to this court, was reversed, and a new trial ordered (15 N. Y. Supp. 901), upon the ground that the proof would have sustained, although it did not require, a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Del Valle v. HylandNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. United Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  2. In re the Estate of EwaldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  3. Buell v. RopeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. United Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API