Legal Opinion
Solomon v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 14, 1922No. 13815Published
1Opinion of the Court
Broyles, O. J.
The evidence was not sufficient to authorize the defendant’s conviction, and the court therefore erred in overruling the general grounds of the motion for a new trial. It is unnecessary to consider the special grounds of the motion.
Judgment reversed.
Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Thomas & Walker, Benton Odom, for plaintiff in error,
cited: 16 Ga. App. 216; 22 Ga. App. 274; 26 Ga. App. 421; Id. 426 (3).
James R. Thomas, solicitor, W. B. Gills, contra.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Alford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921