Legal Opinion

Jorge Nunez v. Connie Gibson

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 4, 2019No. 2:12-cv-04839Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JORGE NUNEZ, Case No. CV 12-04839-AB (DFM) Petitioner, Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States v. Magistrate Judge CONNIE GIBSON, Respondent. Under 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Instead of objections, Petitioner filed a “Motion to Stay Proceeding to Allow a State Decision Which Will Remove Procedural Default.” Dkt. 87 (“Motion to Stay”). Almost two months…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Burton v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Antonio R. Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. Hoeun Yong v. Immigration and Naturalization Service,opinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API