Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Miller v. Davis

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 14, 1965No. 33268Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partErvin, Justice

(agreeing in part and dissenting in part).

There are numerous cases decided by this Court which hold that additional duties and ex officio authority may be vested in an official, whether serving in the executive or judicial branch of the government, where such official has already been commissioned through the elective or appointive process.

See Whitaker v. Parsons, 80 Fla. 352, 86 So. 247; Lainhart v. Catts, 73 Fla. 735, 75 So. 47; Hardee v. State ex rel. Gaines, 83 Fla. 544, 91 So. 909, and Amos v. Mathews, 99 Fla. 1, 126 So. 308. In the last cited case, on page 335 (So.Rep.) the Court points…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Amos v. MathewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Lainhart v. CattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. State of Florida v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. State v. Florida State Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  5. Whitaker v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1920

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API