Commonwealth v. Wormsley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Counsel were appointed under the Act of March 22, 1907, P. L. 31, to represent defendant; he was found guilty of murder of the first degree, and the jury fixed death as the penalty. A new trial was refused by the court below, and defendant was sentenced on the verdict. His two counsel filed an appeal, which they now aslc permission to discontinue.
In support of their petition for leave to withdraw the appeal, counsel aver that it was taken on assurances from relatives of defendant that they would pay an attorney’s fee and the expenses connected with its prosecution, which they have…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Hale v. BrewsterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- In re L.E.C.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. GarramoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Commonwealth v. BeckerJefferson County Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1937
- Commonwealth v. BriscoeDelaware County Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.