Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1922No. 2700PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT

PARKER, J.

Appellant was tried and convicted of the illegal sale- of liquor. The prosecution fixed the date of the sale of the liquor as April 23d. The appellant, besides denying the fact, relied upon an alibi which was thoroughly established if the testimony was to be believed. The ability of the witnesses for appellant to fix the date depended upon the correctness of the date upon a bill for some sawmill supplies issued by a hardware merchant who sold the goods. The prosecution, in rebuttal, attacked the date on the memorandum, and put on two witnesses to show that it had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Scarbrough v. WootenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Holthoff v. FreudenthalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hodges v. HodgesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. NevaresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Lyte v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Holloman v. HollomanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Dyson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API